Comments on: SEX FOR REPRODUCTION

By: Jill

Jill — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:30:15 +0000

And having no religion means you can do whatever the f you like. Such as punching people in the nads at will.

And what is the per centage of pregnant women that get piles? Hence thongs would, presumably, be rather more uncomfortable than normal. Sod the VPL.

By: Therese

Therese — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:23:17 +0000

Thanks for the sexual teachings link. Informative!

I’ve never been pregnant and maternity thongs make me want to punch someone too. Repeatedly. Who thought this would be a brilliant idea?

By: Dangercat

Dangercat — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:36 +0000

I am sooooo glad my father is a Buddhist. I am pleased that the majority of the hang ups and stigma of “sin” where just not my issue.

But on behalf of my nads, I am concerned; I never told, suggested, hinted, intimated, or thought they were a good idea. Please do not punish me for who or whoever got you to where them. I am afraid that should we ever meet, you will recognize me as the man with a book in his lap, legs crossed and trying not to make eye contact.

By: david b

david b — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:05:47 +0000

Attractive as the Buddhist position on masturbation might be, I have to doubt its accuracy as I know that orthodox Judaism does not approve of masturbation (from the story of someone wasting seed instead of doing the honorable thing and marrying the widow of his deceased brother) or homosexuality (described as an abomination).

By: latria

latria — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:02:04 +0000

Yes, I pretty much doubt the accuracy of the Buddhist response.

By: Lizzie

Lizzie — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:52:41 +0000

Interesting chart. I have read something written by the Dalai Lama that said that homosexual couples come to him for blessing and he has to turn them away and tell them that his religion opposes homosexual acts… something about the “other” holes is not okay.

By: Jules

Jules — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:51:34 +0000

I found myself smiling at my own religion of Judaism, but did you scroll down far enough to see the Unitarian Universalists? WOW, they might as well just call themselves “No time for temple and here’s why!”; and might I add that I’m converting tomorrow.
Jules
House of Jules

By: lacey

lacey — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:57:27 +0000

Nai: amen! Someone told me a couple of months ago (I’m 33 weeks now) that the underwear that I “have to wear” “must be horrible.” Meh? There’s special underwear for pregnancy?

By: Nai

Nai — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:48:48 +0000

#10 Ditto! I wore my normal thongs throughout my entire pregnancy. I doubt there are any differences, except, with maternity in the name, it’ll cost twice as much.

By: Julie

Julie — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:46:34 +0000

Very interesting!

Can I just ask, WTF with the maternity thong? Is it not exactly the same as a regular thong?